<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> 
<rss version="2.0"> 
 <channel> 
<title><![CDATA[Steve Kramer - Articles - RealClearPolitics]]></title><link>http://www.RealClearPolicy.com/authors/rss/archive/53175.xml</link><description><![CDATA[Steve Kramer]]></description><category domain="53175">Author</category><item>
							<title><![CDATA[A Return to the Constitutional Horrors of Dred Scott]]></title>
							<link>https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/5376627-supreme-court-universal-injunctions-ruling/</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/5376627-supreme-court-universal-injunctions-ruling/]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Steve Kramer</author>
							<description><![CDATA[In ordinary times, someone could read the'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' Supreme Court'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('™').';'s decision'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' on the legality of so-called '&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('œ').';'universal injunctions'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('�').';' as just the latest example of an old dispute: the proper way to interpret the Constitution and the jurisdiction of federal courts. Justice'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' Amy...]]></description>
						</item></channel>
		</rss>