<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> 
<rss version="2.0"> 
 <channel> 
<title><![CDATA[Jill Jacobson - Articles - RealClearPolitics]]></title><link>http://www.RealClearPolicy.com/authors/rss/archive/49568.xml</link><description><![CDATA[Jill Jacobson]]></description><category domain="49568">Author</category><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Justices on Both Sides Reject Modern Civil Asset Forfeiture]]></title>
							<link>https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2024/05/29/justices_on_both_sides_reject_modern_civil_asset_forfeiture__151013.html</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2024/05/29/justices_on_both_sides_reject_modern_civil_asset_forfeiture__151013.html]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Jill Jacobson</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Civil asset forfeiture may have won the battle, but it will likely lose the war '&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('“').';' at least in the Roberts Court. 
The Supreme Court recently decided Culley v. Marshall, a case challenging the constitutionality of laws that deny owners prompt hearings when their possessions are...]]></description>
						</item></channel>
		</rss>