<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> 
<rss version="2.0"> 
 <channel> 
<title><![CDATA[Win McCormack - Articles - RealClearPolitics]]></title><link>http://www.RealClearPolicy.com/authors/rss/archive/38419.xml</link><description><![CDATA[Win McCormack]]></description><category domain="38419">Author</category><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Socialism In No Country]]></title>
							<link>https://newrepublic.com/article/153788/socialism-no-country-revolutionary-left-bad-democracy</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://newrepublic.com/article/153788/socialism-no-country-revolutionary-left-bad-democracy]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Win McCormack</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Why the revolutionary left has always been bad news for democracy]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Wisconsin Regressivism]]></title>
							<link>https://newrepublic.com/article/148896/wisconsin-regressivism</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://newrepublic.com/article/148896/wisconsin-regressivism]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Win McCormack</author>
							<description><![CDATA[So, what if we apply the question to '&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('œ').';'progressivism,'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('�').';' so-called: Is there an opposite to that? Answer: not if the question refers to the vague, amorphous, undefined progressivism of today. There can be no antonym for a term that is lexically meaningless.]]></description>
						</item></channel>
		</rss>