<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> 
<rss version="2.0"> 
 <channel> 
<title><![CDATA[Mary Ziegler - Articles - RealClearPolitics]]></title><link>http://www.RealClearPolicy.com/authors/rss/archive/37104.xml</link><description><![CDATA[Mary Ziegler]]></description><category domain="37104">Author</category><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Abortion Foes Have New Strategy To Fight the Right To Choose]]></title>
							<link>https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/29/opinions/abortion-ban-south-carolina-gop-strategy-ziegler/index.html</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/29/opinions/abortion-ban-south-carolina-gop-strategy-ziegler/index.html]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Mary Ziegler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[The South Carolina Supreme Court'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('™').';'s recent abortion decision is a reminder of the importance of state constitutional law in the post-Roe era. By upholding a six-week ban virtually identical to one struck down by the same court in January, this ruling means that South Carolina will go...]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[The Texas Abortion-Pill Ruling Signals Pro-Lifers' Next Push]]></title>
							<link>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-texas-abortion-pill-ruling-signals-pro-lifers-next-push/ar-AA19ElL9</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-texas-abortion-pill-ruling-signals-pro-lifers-next-push/ar-AA19ElL9]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2023 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Mary Ziegler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Get used to hearing a lot more about the Comstock Act.]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Roe Was Never Roe After All]]></title>
							<link>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/roe-was-never-roe-after-all/ar-AA16An2G</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/roe-was-never-roe-after-all/ar-AA16An2G]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2023 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
							<author>Mary Ziegler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[The landmark decision never gave women the rights that people wanted to believe it did.]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[As 50th Anniversary Looms, Roe v. Wade Still Matters]]></title>
							<link>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/as-its-50th-anniversary-looms-roe-v-wade-still-matters/ar-AA16vDAB</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/as-its-50th-anniversary-looms-roe-v-wade-still-matters/ar-AA16vDAB]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
							<author>Mary Ziegler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[The decision that articulated a constitutional right to abortion meant different things to different people '&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('”').';' a quality that holds even now that the ruling has been overturned.]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Election Results Showed That Voters Do Care About Abortion]]></title>
							<link>https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/10/opinions/midterm-elections-abortion-rights-ziegler</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/10/opinions/midterm-elections-abortion-rights-ziegler]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
							<author>Mary Ziegler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[For the past several weeks, pundits warned that Democrats had peaked too early. True, Americans did not like the Supreme Court'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('™').';'s decision this summer to reverse Roe v. Wade and destroy abortion rights. But we were all told that June was a long time ago. Other issues were now front...]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Conservatives Aren't Just Ending Roe--They're Delighting in It]]></title>
							<link>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-conservatives-aren-t-just-ending-roe-they-re-delighting-in-it/ar-AAWSIFd</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-conservatives-aren-t-just-ending-roe-they-re-delighting-in-it/ar-AAWSIFd]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Mary Ziegler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[This is the work of the Supreme Court's emboldened, radical majority.]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Conservative Justices Are Launching a Legal Revolution]]></title>
							<link>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-conservative-justices-dont-seem-too-worried-about-the-courts-legitimacy/ar-AATW7VN</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/the-conservative-justices-dont-seem-too-worried-about-the-courts-legitimacy/ar-AATW7VN]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
							<author>Mary Ziegler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Fears about the Supreme Court's public reputation used to have a moderating influence'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('”').';'but that may not be the case any longer.]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[It Didn't Go Well for Texas at the Supreme Court]]></title>
							<link>https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/01/opinions/texas-abortion-law-short-lived-ziegler/index.html</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/01/opinions/texas-abortion-law-short-lived-ziegler/index.html]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Mary Ziegler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Law professor Mary Ziegler writes after Monday's Supreme Court oral argument on SB8, Texas's restrictive abortion measure, that while the justices' questions implied that the Texas law is in trouble, they also showed that Roe v. Wade is in trouble too.]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Have Abortion Opponents Set Themselves Up to Fail?]]></title>
							<link>https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/15/opinion/alabama-abortion-supreme-court.html</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/15/opinion/alabama-abortion-supreme-court.html]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Mary Ziegler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Alabama, Georgia and the fetal personhood trap.'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';']]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[The Abortion Wars Have Become a Fight Over Science]]></title>
							<link>https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/22/opinion/abortion-roe-science.html</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/22/opinion/abortion-roe-science.html]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
							<author>Mary Ziegler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Forty-six years after Roe, the two camps increasingly disagree on basic facts about abortion '&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('”').';' and who has the authority to determine them.]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade Was About More Than Abortion]]></title>
							<link>https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/21/opinion/roe-v-wade-abortion.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fopinion</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/21/opinion/roe-v-wade-abortion.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fopinion]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
							<author>Mary Ziegler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[It was also about our right to privacy.]]></description>
						</item></channel>
		</rss>