<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<rss version="2.0"> 
 <channel> 
<title><![CDATA[RealClearPolitics - Articles by Richard White]]></title><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/?id=22649</link><description><![CDATA[Richard White]]></description><category domain="22649">Author</category><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Fast Train to Nowhere]]></title>
							<link><![CDATA[http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/24/opinion/24white.html]]></link>
							<guid><![CDATA[http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/24/opinion/24white.html]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<description><![CDATA[<p>
Stanford, Calif.        </p><p>
IT is hard for liberals like me to find good news in the latest agreement to cut the federal budget, but there is at least one silver lining: subsidies for high-speed rail have been sharply reduced. Why is this good news?        </p><p>
In his State of the Union address, President Obama compared high-speed rail to the 19th-century transcontinental railroads as parallel examples of American innovation. I fear he may be right.        </p><p>
For the country as a whole, the Pacific Railway Act of 1864 and subsequent legislation subsidizing the transcontinental railroads &mdash; the lines that crossed the continent from the 98th meridian to the Pacific Coast...]]></description>
						</item></channel></rss>