<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> 
<rss version="2.0"> 
 <channel> 
<title><![CDATA[Jonathan Adler - Articles - RealClearPolitics]]></title><link>http://www.RealClearPolicy.com/authors/rss/archive/20293.xml</link><description><![CDATA[Jonathan Adler]]></description><category domain="20293">Author</category><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Roberts, Birthright Citizenship and Judicial Overreach]]></title>
							<link>https://www.civitasoutlook.com/research/the-birthright-citizenship-decision-will-not-end-the-birthright-citizenship-debate</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.civitasoutlook.com/research/the-birthright-citizenship-decision-will-not-end-the-birthright-citizenship-debate]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Jonathan Adler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[It is unlikely that Trump v. Barbara ended the debate over birthright citizenship. It may have truly started it.]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[The Judicial Nomination Train Keeps Rolling]]></title>
							<link>http://reason.com/volokh/2018/02/14/the-judicial-nomination-train-keeps-roll</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[http://reason.com/volokh/2018/02/14/the-judicial-nomination-train-keeps-roll]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2018 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
							<author>Jonathan Adler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Whatever else the Trump Administration is (or is not) doing, it continues to announce excellent judicial nominees for federal appellate courts - while]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[The Law Means What It Says]]></title>
							<link>http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/03/04/obamacare-supreme-court-challenge-oral-arguments-editorials-debates/24388443/</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/03/04/obamacare-supreme-court-challenge-oral-arguments-editorials-debates/24388443/]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
							<author>Jonathan Adler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[The King v. Burwell challenge to the Affordable Care Act at the Supreme Court presents a straightforward case of statutory interpretation. The question is whether the law authorizes the issuance of tax credits in exchanges established by the federal government.]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Reining in Obamacare--and the President]]></title>
							<link>https://www.google.com/#q=Reining+in+ObamaCare%E2%80%94and+the+President</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.google.com/#q=Reining+in+ObamaCare%E2%80%94and+the+President]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Jonathan Adler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('”').';'a tribunal second only to the Supreme Court'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('”').';'ruled on Tuesday that the Obama administration broke the law. The panel found that President Obama spent billions of taxpayer dollars he had no authority to spend,...]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Should the Post Run a Correction on Koch Story?]]></title>
							<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/03/27/should-the-post-run-a-correction-to-the-koch-oil-sands-story/</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/03/27/should-the-post-run-a-correction-to-the-koch-oil-sands-story/]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Jonathan Adler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Last week, a story by Steven Mufson and Juliet Eilperin declared that Koch Industries was '&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('œ').';'the biggest lease owner in Canada'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('™').';'s oil sands.'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('�').';' This claim was made in the headline and opening paragraph. After receiving some push-back, the pair wrote a follow-up claiming that...]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[A Supremely Consequential Court Term]]></title>
							<link>http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/278914/supremely-consequential-jonathan-h-adler</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/278914/supremely-consequential-jonathan-h-adler]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Jonathan Adler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Today marks the opening of what could be a blockbuster Supreme Court term.'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' When the Court adjourned in June, it had already agreed to hear a number of important cases implicating everything from '&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('œ').';'fleeting expletives'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('�').';' on television and the application of civil-rights laws to...]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[EPA Pushes to Impose New Controls]]></title>
							<link>http://reason.com/archives/2010/02/15/the-epas-carbon-footprint</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[http://reason.com/archives/2010/02/15/the-epas-carbon-footprint]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
							<author>Jonathan Adler</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Media Inquiries and Reprint...]]></description>
						</item></channel>
		</rss>