<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> 
<rss version="2.0"> 
 <channel> 
<title><![CDATA[Ed Whelan - Articles - RealClearPolitics]]></title><link>http://www.RealClearPolicy.com/authors/rss/archive/15968.xml</link><description><![CDATA[Ed Whelan]]></description><category domain="15968">Author</category><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Ruth Marcus's Critique of Originalism Is Bunk]]></title>
							<link>https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/ruth-marcuss-critique-of-originalism-is-bunk/</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/ruth-marcuss-critique-of-originalism-is-bunk/]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
							<author>Ed Whelan</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus has written a nearly 5000-word critique of originalism titled '&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('œ').';'Originalism is bunk. Liberal lawyers shouldn'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('™').';'t fall for it.'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('�').';' From its unusual length, its confident pronouncements, and its over-the-top rhetoric (e.g.,...]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Alito Makes Masterful Argument to 'Overturn' Roe v. Wade]]></title>
							<link>https://nypost.com/2022/05/03/alitos-draft-masterfully-makes-the-overturn-roe-argument-crystal-clear/</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://nypost.com/2022/05/03/alitos-draft-masterfully-makes-the-overturn-roe-argument-crystal-clear/]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Ed Whelan</author>
							<description><![CDATA[Justice Samuel Alito's draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Center is a masterful account of why Roe v. Wade was wrong from the start.]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Susan Collins vs. Susan Collins]]></title>
							<link>https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/susan-collins-vs-susan-collins/</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/susan-collins-vs-susan-collins/]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Ed Whelan</author>
							<description><![CDATA[According to a reporter'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('™').';'s'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' tweet, Senator Susan Collins stated today: '&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('œ').';'If this leaked draft opinion is the final decision and this reporting is accurate, it would be completely inconsistent with what Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our...]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Dobbs and the Court's 'Legitimacy']]></title>
							<link>https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/dobbs-and-the-courts-legitimacy/</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/dobbs-and-the-courts-legitimacy/]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
							<author>Ed Whelan</author>
							<description><![CDATA[The'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' new issue'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' of'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' National Review'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' is dedicated to the theme '&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('œ').';'End'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' Roe'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('�').';' and features an excellent collection of sixteen articles that comprehensively '&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('œ').';'examine the legal arguments, the policy arguments, and the social arguments for finally ending the'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' Roe'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('‚').';' era in...]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow's Racial Smear of a Second Circuit Nominee]]></title>
							<link>https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/rachel-maddows-racial-smear-of-second-circuit-nominee-steven-menashi/</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/rachel-maddows-racial-smear-of-second-circuit-nominee-steven-menashi/]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Ed Whelan</author>
							<description><![CDATA[In a lengthy segment on MSNBC last night, Rachel Maddow grossly distorts Menashi's argument and tries to twist it into a high-brow argument for racial purity. (Video at 9:00-9:36.) She falsely cl'&#'.ord('Ã').';''&#'.ord('¢').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('€').';''&#'.ord('Â').';''&#'.ord('¦').';']]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[George Will's Misguided Attack on Senate Republicans]]></title>
							<link>http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/432992/george-will-garland-senate</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/432992/george-will-garland-senate]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2016 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Ed Whelan</author>
							<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						</item><item>
							<title><![CDATA[George Will is Wrong About <em>Boumediene</em>]]></title>
							<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=M2RiOTU2YjU3ZWE1MGU5NDdhNGJhNWVlY2Q0YzI1ZTg=</link>
							<guid><![CDATA[http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=M2RiOTU2YjU3ZWE1MGU5NDdhNGJhNWVlY2Q0YzI1ZTg=]]></guid>							
							<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
							<author>Ed Whelan</author>
							<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
						</item></channel>
		</rss>